Re: No function matches the given name and argument types.

[Christophe Pettus]

> On Jan 16, 2023, at 09:53, David G. Johnston <david.g.johns...@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> I don't see any good way to say: "given this function signature, and the fact 
> it cannot be found, what are the next closest function signatures that are 
> present".

I can see a use-case for such functionality, though: A "did you mean?" error 
message.