> adrian.kla...@aklaver.com wrote: > >> b...@yugabyte.com: >> >> Consider this wording. It also uses “good practice”. >> « >> It is good practice to limit the number of superuser roles that exist in a >> cluster to exactly one: the inevitable bootstrap superuser. This recognizes >> the fact that, once the initial configuration of a cluster has been done >> immediately after its creation (which configuration is done while still in >> self-imposed single-user mode), there are then very few, and infrequent, >> tasks that require the power of the superuser role. >> » >> >> Nobody supports it! > > I went back through the thread and don't anywhere when you made the above > statement, correct me if I am wrong. In that case there was nothing to > support or not support until now. What people where responding to the title > of the thread: > >> "Seeking practice recommendation: is there ever a use case to have two or >> more superusers?" > > That is a different ask.
I didn't mean to say that I'd already written the sentence that starts "It is good practice to limit the number of superuser roles that exist in a cluster...". Sorry if I gave that impression. It was just a strawman version of what I practice recommendation might look like that used the same general wording style as the one about "a role that has the CREATEDB and CREATEROLE".
