Hi all,

I use logical replication to synchronize one big table + some small tables.

I know that if all tables are part of the same subscription it will be executed 
in transactional order. In other words, as long as the transaction that updated 
the big table is not synchronized and executed on the subscriber side, no other 
transactions to the smaller tables will be synchronized to the subscriber side. 
 Therefore, I split it into two subscriptions, one for the big table and 
another for the smaller tables.

  *   How can I give higher priority to the subscription that synchronizing the 
smaller tables over the subscription that synchronizes the large table?
  *   If that is not possible, how do I make sure the subscription that 
synchronizes the big table does not "starve" the subscription that synchronizes 
the small tables and leave it with almost no bandwidth?



Thanks!

IMPORTANT - This email and any attachments is intended for the above named 
addressee(s), and may contain information which is confidential or privileged. 
If you are not the intended recipient, please inform the sender immediately and 
delete this email: you should not copy or use this e-mail for any purpose nor 
disclose its contents to any person.

Reply via email to