Am Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 10:10:30AM +0200 schrieb Karsten Hilbert: > Am Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 05:10:58PM -0400 schrieb Tom Lane: > > > (I recall that somewhere we have some code that warns about no-op > > grants. I wonder if issuing a warning for no-op revokes would be > > helpful.) > > Surely, in the light of security a no-op revoke is > potentially more dangerous than a no-op grant.
In the sense where no-op means "despite being revoked it is still granted by another grant" rather than "the revoke is a no-op because it is already revoked", that is. (although the latter can be used to inform on the first if the latter extends to all "levels" of revokage ... :-) Thanks, Karsten -- GPG 40BE 5B0E C98E 1713 AFA6 5BC0 3BEA AC80 7D4F C89B
