> On 12 Sep 2022, at 13:21, Peter Eisentraut > <peter.eisentr...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > On 11.09.22 23:43, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: >>> On 11 Sep 2022, at 23:35, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> Should we document these functions as obsolete when using >>> OpenSSL >= 1.1.0 ? >> Given that 1.1.0+ is very common, it's probably not a bad idea to document >> them >> as obsolete but harmless. Unless you beat me to it I can propose a patch. > > AFAICT, RHEL 7 ships with an older version. I think that's still pretty > widespread. Fair enough. That doesn't however IMO prevent us from adding a note that 1.1.0 and onwards are different. The attached keeps the strong wording of the main para, but adds a note after the related functions. -- Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/
pqinitopenssl.diff
Description: Binary data
