Thanks, works perfectly! On Sun, Jan 23, 2022 at 4:22 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Paul van der Linden <paul.doskabou...@gmail.com> writes: > > Thanks for the clarification, but giving up performance is a no-go for > us. > > Also I have my concerns about shemaqualifying each and every use of the > -> > > operator, there are really a lot of them in my functions and it would > > severely impact readability. > > Are these the only 2 solutions possible? > > As of v14 you could use SQL-style function definitions, so that the > operator is parsed at function definition time instead of runtime. > > regards, tom lane >
