On 1/14/22 13:04, Daniel Westermann (DWE) wrote:
On 1/14/22 1:40 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
snip]
We shouldn't be trying to provide
documentation around how to write a tool like pgbackrest, we should,
instead, have a tool like pgbackrest in core with its own documentation,
as most other RDBMS's do.
That's an excellent solution to this problem.
While I know the reasons for not having something like pgbackrest in core, I
think this is a major drawback for the project. People coming from commercial
systems are used to have that tooling included by default.
They are also used to paying a big whopping bill, which is why they go
looking for alternatives. So like most things is it a tradeoff, sweat
equity vs hard cash.
+1 for having that in core
Regards
Daniel
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.kla...@aklaver.com
