Hi again. Is this not the right ML? Which PostgreSQL ML should this question be asked to, to have a chance to get an answer? I'm new to this particular ML, and I'm surprised by the silence. Thanks, --DD
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 9:46 AM Dominique Devienne <ddevie...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > The doc at > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/libpq-notice-processing.html is > not clear to me on whether it should be PQclear'd or not. Who manages the > lifetime of that PGresult? > > Also, the "could be called as long as either the PGconn or PGresult exist" > mention, > implies we do not need to clear the notice callback before PQfinish'ing > the connection. > (and that does not seem possible, given passing in a NULL pointer is just > a *get* it seems). > Is that correct? > > Yet we are seeing our notice callback being called with an invalid > PGresult (i.e. crash accessing it). > What could be the reasons for that? I'm assuming user-error in our code, > but I don't see why yet. > > Thanks for any insights. --DD >
