On Tue, 2021-09-21 at 19:35 +1200, Tim Uckun wrote: > It seems like it would be so much more useful if the timestamp with > time zone type actually stored the time zone in the record.
This has been requested before, and it would be closer to the intention of the SQL standard, but I guess it won't happen. For one, it would change on-disk storage, which would make it impossible to use pg_upgrade. It also would require timestamps to occupy more than 8 bytes. The best solution is probably to explicitly store the time zone as an additional column. Yours, Laurenz Albe -- Cybertec | https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com