On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 6:46 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johns...@gmail.com> writes: > > > as well as the fact that 0 disables the logical replication > > subscribing feature altogether, and precludes the background worker > > scheduler process from launching at startup? > > I'd be in favor of mentioning the former, but the latter seems like > an implementation detail. > > I can see that point - but for me the deciding factor is that this detail ends up showing up in the O/S process list and talking about that is desirable to me.
David J.
