In pg_wal catalog there is no file by that name:
$ ls pg_wal/ | grep 000000000000013E00000097
$
but there is files with very old time of creation:
$ ls -lart pg_wal/
total 30933220
-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 299 Dec 30 05:44
000000020000013E00000097.00000108.backup
-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 16777216 Dec 30 06:12
000000010000000000000001
-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 16777216 Dec 30 06:12
000000020000013E00000098
-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 44 Dec 30 06:29 00000002.history
-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 16777216 Dec 30 06:29
000000020000013E00000099
-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 16777216 Dec 30 09:01
000000020000013E0000009A
-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 16777216 Dec 30 09:57
000000020000013E0000009B
..... till now .....
-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 16777216 Mar 16 12:59
0000000200000145000000F2
-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 16777216 Mar 16 13:50
0000000200000145000000F3
-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 16777216 Mar 16 14:39
0000000200000145000000F4
drwx------ 2 postgres postgres 118784 Mar 16 14:39 archive_status
-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 16777216 Mar 16 15:19
0000000200000145000000F6
drwx------ 3 postgres postgres 94208 Mar 16 15:19 .
-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 16777216 Mar 16 15:25
0000000200000145000000F5
drwx------ 19 postgres postgres 4096 Mar 16 15:25 ..
and on master current WAL-file:
postgres=# select pg_walfile_name(pg_current_wal_lsn());
pg_walfile_name
--------------------------
0000000200000145000000F6
(1 row)
вт, 16 мар. 2021 г. в 14:21, Laurenz Albe <laurenz.a...@cybertec.at>:
> On Tue, 2021-03-16 at 09:49 +0200, Andrew Anderson wrote:
> > 2021-03-16 09:44:03.997 EET [97581] [] [] [] []DEBUG: attempting to
> remove WAL segments older than log file 000000000000013E00000097
>
> That was the entry I was hoping to see.
>
> So, are all older WAL segments deleted or recycled?
> Is that a reasonably recent WAL segment?
>
> Yours,
> Laurenz Albe
> --
> Cybertec | https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com
>
>
