Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@gmail.com> writes:
> Another thought: if it's not a sharing violation, I wonder if we
> should consider dumping more raw Windows error information in the
> messages we log, because, if I recall correctly, we're converting many
> Windows error codes into few Unix-style error numbers and thereby
> throwing away valuable clues. It makes it a bit more confusing when
> trying to ask a Windows expert what might be happening.
Yeah, I've wondered for some time if the apparent EACCES code is
actually being mapped from something other than ERROR_SHARING_VIOLATION
in (some of?) these reports. The hard part is to hold onto the
Windows error code alongside errno without massively invasive changes.
regards, tom lane
