On a whole fleet of load-balanced replicas, we saw an incident where one particular query started backing up on MultiXactMemberControlLock and multixact_member. There was no sign of this backup on the primary. Under what conditions would there be enough multixact members on a replica (where you can't do UPDATE / SELECT FOR UPDATE / FOR SHARE) to start spilling to disk? -- -- Christophe Pettus x...@thebuild.com
- MultiXactMemberControlLock contention on a replica Christophe Pettus
- Re: MultiXactMemberControlLock contention on a repl... Laurenz Albe
- Re: MultiXactMemberControlLock contention on a ... Christophe Pettus
- Re: MultiXactMemberControlLock contention o... Laurenz Albe
- Re: MultiXactMemberControlLock contenti... Christophe Pettus
- Re: MultiXactMemberControlLock con... Laurenz Albe