We are an ISV. I agree the risk involved in sharing the data. Still few of
my customers need that facility and are accustomed to it when using SQL Server.
On switch over to PG, I face this issue as a limitation. Need to find and
provide a solution.
For those customers, having good volume of data, we're implementing replication
which resolves this issue. For smaller sized database (company(ies)), they
prefer (and we too) this copy and re-copy procedure, to transfer the data
between home and office.
And this pandemic made this a compulsory feature, which they don't want to
loose. This transfer is not a one time job, it gets repeated, which they have
been doing for years. Here security is not a big concern for them.
Portability is the need for them.
Happiness AlwaysBKR Sivaprakash
On Friday, 22 January, 2021, 09:28:13 pm IST, Rory Campbell-Lange
<r...@campbell-lange.net> wrote:
On 22/01/21, Benedict Holland (benedict.m.holl...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Sometimes it is easier to simply > replicate the existing bad process
> that a team agrees to rather than making > a better process.
As Alvar Aalto said in a lecture at MIT
It is not by temporary building that Parthenon comes on Acropolis.
