> > PostgreSQL doesn't have an exact equivalent. Typically, the OLD and NEW > > values are compared and then action is taken based on that. For example, > > in PL/pgSQL: > > IF NEW.is_canceled IS NOT DISTINCT FROM OLD.is_canceled THEN > > NEW.is_canceled := etc etc ; > > ENDIF; > > There's currently no way to detect if the column was simply not mentioned > > at all in the UPDATE statement. > > That's not completely true: you can make the whole trigger firing > dependent on that, by writing something like > > CREATE TRIGGER tgname BEFORE UPDATE OF column_name [, ... ] ON table ... > > and then the trigger won't fire if the column is not mentioned.
Well, this works if I've something like IF UPDATING(...) THEN But since I've IF NOT UPDATING(...) THEN This isn't working. Or am I missing something? BR Dirk -- Dirk Mika Software Developer mika:timing GmbH Strundepark - Kürtener Str. 11b 51465 Bergisch Gladbach Germany fon +49 2202 2401-1197 dirk.m...@mikatiming.de www.mikatiming.de AG Köln HRB 47509 * WEEE-Reg.-Nr. DE 90029884 Geschäftsführer: Harald Mika, Jörg Mika
