Line 88 is this line: host    database    user          0.0.0.0/0
    scram-sha-256.

I might have forgotten to change one of the names in the earlier mails.

On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 7:38 PM Hemil Ruparel <hemilruparel2...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I commented out scram-sha-256 lines for IPv4 and IPv6. I still got
> authentication failure. The log output now says:
> FATAL:  password authentication failed for user "centos"
> DETAIL:  Connection matched pg_hba.conf line 89: "host       database
> user          0.0.0.0/0               md5"
>
> On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 7:34 PM Hemil Ruparel <hemilruparel2...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Yes. Password encryption is set to scram-sha-256.
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 10:36 PM Adrian Klaver <adrian.kla...@aklaver.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/27/20 12:37 AM, Hemil Ruparel wrote:
>>> > The log says:
>>> >  > FATAL:  password authentication failed for user "centos"
>>> >  > DETAIL:  Connection matched pg_hba.conf line 88: "host    user
>>>
>>> > password 0.0.0.0/0 <http://0.0.0.0/0>               scram-sha-256"
>>>
>>> To me that looks like a strange line for pg_hba.conf and I don't see it
>>> in the pg_hba.conf file you sent earlier.
>>>
>>> What is line 88 in your pg_hba.conf?
>>>
>>> >
>>> > I can't understand where is the problem as both psql and pgadmin
>>> connect
>>> > without problems using the same password
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 1:46 PM Hemil Ruparel
>>> > <hemilruparel2...@gmail.com <mailto:hemilruparel2...@gmail.com>>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >     Sorry. This was the replication section:
>>> >     local   replication     all
>>> peer
>>> >     host    replication     all 127.0.0.1/32 <http://127.0.0.1/32>
>>>
>>> >           scram-sha-256
>>> >     host    replication     all             ::1/128
>>> >     scram-sha-256
>>> >
>>> >     On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 1:41 PM Laurenz Albe
>>> >     <laurenz.a...@cybertec.at <mailto:laurenz.a...@cybertec.at>>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >         On Fri, 2020-11-27 at 13:34 +0530, Hemil Ruparel wrote:
>>> >          > I have restarted postgres quite a few times to try making
>>> >         configuration changes and it
>>> >          >  is always back up. I don't know how. Feels weird to me. I
>>> >         didn't add the line
>>> >          >  "local replication all". It was there by default
>>> >
>>> >         I don't believe that.
>>> >
>>> >         This is how it looks by default:
>>> >
>>> >         # Allow replication connections from localhost, by a user with
>>> the
>>> >         # replication privilege.
>>> >         local   replication     all
>>> >           trust
>>> >         host    replication     all 127.0.0.1/32 <http://127.0.0.1/32>
>>>
>>> >                    trust
>>> >         host    replication     all             ::1/128
>>> >           trust
>>> >
>>> >         Yours,
>>> >         Laurenz Albe
>>> >         --
>>> >         Cybertec | https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com
>>> >         <https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com>
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Adrian Klaver
>>> adrian.kla...@aklaver.com
>>>
>>

Reply via email to