On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 10:57:00PM -0700, Rob Sargent wrote:
> > It issues this message and fails:
> >
> > if (PQntuples(res) > 0)
> > {
> > if (!found_public_plpython_handler)
> > {
> > pg_log(PG_WARNING,
> > "\nThe old cluster has a
> > \"plpython_call_handler\" function defined\n"
> > "in the \"public\" schema which is a duplicate of
> > the one defined\n"
> > "in the \"pg_catalog\" schema. You can confirm
> > this by executing\n"
> > "in psql:\n"
> > "\n"
> > " \\df *.plpython_call_handler\n"
> > "\n"
> > "The \"public\" schema version of this function
> > was created by a\n"
> > "pre-8.1 install of plpython, and must be removed
> > for pg_upgrade\n"
> > "to complete because it references a now-obsolete
> > \"plpython\"\n"
> > "shared object file. You can remove the
> > \"public\" schema version\n"
> > "of this function by running the following
> > command:\n"
> > "\n"
> > " DROP FUNCTION
> > public.plpython_call_handler()\n"
> > "\n"
> > "in each affected database:\n"
> > "\n");
> > }
> > pg_log(PG_WARNING, " %s\n", active_db->db_name);
> > found_public_plpython_handler = true;
> > }
> > PQclear(res);
> > }
> >
> > PQfinish(conn);
> > }
> >
> > if (found_public_plpython_handler)
> > pg_fatal("Remove the problem functions from the old cluster to
> > continue.\n");
> >
> >
> Does this jive with OP’s experience? Or should it?
It didn't trigger this message for him, and I am also wondering if it
should have.
--
Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com
The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee
