Dennis Jacobfeuerborn <denni...@conversis.de> writes:
> On 11/13/20 4:02 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> This looks quite normal to me. If you'd pulled the power plug on the
>> primary system at the time you made this backup, you would likely see
>> the same message at the end of its crash recovery. Some sort of
>> corrupt-WAL-entry report is expected at the end of WAL replay anytime
>> you didn't have a clean shutdown.
> But the system the backup was pulled from kept running fine. Also
> wouldn't that make re-attaching the system to the primary impossible
> since replication cannot be continued due to the broken WAL record?
There is no "broken WAL record". There is only junk following the
primary's current WAL write point.
> What I would expect is that pg_basebackup only transfer healthy WAL
> entries so that a restored system can pick up right after that with
> streaming replication.
You need to adjust your expectations. pg_basebackup doesn't parse the WAL
data, because it has no need to. It just copies whole WAL segment files.
regards, tom lane
