On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 3:30 PM Ron <ronljohnso...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 11/9/20 3:05 PM, David G. Johnston wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 2:01 PM Ron <ronljohnso...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> My suggestion is to add a "table of contents" at the top of non-trivial >> sections that simply lists available functions by name (generally ignoring >> argument variations) and a quick one line description of purpose. Once a >> person finds the name of the function that suits their needs they can then >> reference the main table for details, warnings, and examples. >> >> >> This is what TOCs are for, no? >> >> > Are you criticizing my over-explanation of the phrase "table of contents" > here? > > > Why do you think that? > > I'm *agreeing* this is why TOCs were invented. > > Because agreement without elaboration usually just merits a +1 so I read more into the statement than you intended.
David J.
