On Sat, Sep 26, 2020 at 10:11 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Julien Rouhaud <rjuju...@gmail.com> writes: > > So, apparently pg_available_extension_versions already had those > > fields so all the required infrastructure was already there. I just > > added the exact same fields to pg_available_extensions, see attached > > patch. > > The reason that pg_available_extensions has only the fields it has > is that these other values are potentially extension-version-dependent. > I do not think we can accept this patch.
Oh, I didn't know there could be multiple control files per extension, and I missed the "aux" reference. So indeed this patch is unacceptable.
