Ben <benten...@outlook.com>
<mwhpr06mb2400e1fa4aad12440ea96b79b9...@mwhpr06mb2400.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
writes:
> You are right none of them is what I originally used to create them
> which should be
> `select * from utlog.stats_per_shift_filtered_b0206`, but they do look
> different,
This discrepancy could explain a lot:
> (stats_per_shift_filtered_u0206.wsft)::character varying AS wsft,
vs
> stats_per_shift_filtered_b0206.wsft,
Your problem query has a WHERE clause testing wsft, so this difference
is subtly affecting what that WHERE clause means. That could result in
a plan change, thereby changing the row output order, which as already
noted would be sufficient to explain the inconsistency.
If I had to bet I'd suspect that the extra cast is blocking use of an
index on wsft.
regards, tom lane
