Thomas Kellerer <sham...@gmx.net> writes:
> Tom Lane schrieb am 20.07.2020 um 20:04:
>> Yeah, duplicate keys does seem odd here. Can you provide a self
>> contained example?
> I'll try, but this is a production system.
> Extracting the necessary anonymous data will be tricky.
If this is a PG bug, it should be possible to reproduce it with
completely random/generated data. The key ingredient that you
have and the rest of us don't is the process and timing by which
the primary key values are introduced.
> Is there any chance the version difference might cause this?
> And a slightly outdated 11.x at that?
Hmmm ... I do not recall any recent bug fixes that seem to match
this symptom, but replication isn't a part of the code that
I'm the world's best expert on. In any case, we do offer as
standard advice that you should reproduce a problem on the latest
minor release before filing a bug report.
regards, tom lane
