Greetings, * Paul Förster (paul.foers...@gmail.com) wrote: > I wouldn't work out the procedure myself, especially since there is a free > working solution already. It's dangerous if you do it yourself and make a > mistake. > > In our company, we rely on Patroni (https://github.com/zalando/patroni). Yes, > it uses pg_rewind in the background but it does switchover and failover fast > and reliably (also for high load databases), handles timelines automatically > and so on.
Patroni also has the option to use pgbackrest instead of pg_rewind. Thanks, Stephen
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
