Thanks Adrian, > You could break it down into multiple transactions if there is way to specify > ranges of records. Say I couldn't break it up, would it be faster in or out of the transaction? It depends whether you have concurrent transactions using the table. If you do, I think it would be better to split the update between smaller transactions.
- UPDATE on 20 Million Records Transaction or not? Jason Ralph
- Re: UPDATE on 20 Million Records Transaction or not? Adrian Klaver
- RE: UPDATE on 20 Million Records Transaction or no... Jason Ralph
- Re: UPDATE on 20 Million Records Transaction o... luis . roberto
- Re: UPDATE on 20 Million Records Transaction or not? Ron
- RE: UPDATE on 20 Million Records Transaction or no... Jason Ralph
- Re: UPDATE on 20 Million Records Transaction o... Ron
- Re: UPDATE on 20 Million Records Transacti... Ganesh Korde
- Re: UPDATE on 20 Million Records Tran... Michael Lewis
- RE: UPDATE on 20 Million Records ... Jason Ralph
- Re: UPDATE on 20 Million Records Transaction or not? Tim Cross