On Sunday, June 21, 2020, Guy Burgess <g...@burgess.co.nz> wrote: > > a.id, a.title, b.id, b.title
You are missing some double-quotes there. Of course, this can be achieved by avoiding the (often frowned-upon) SELECT > * syntax in the first place and using explicit column names, Or choose better, distinguishing, column names. > Could there be an (admittedly non-standard) option to automatically prefix > table/alias names to columns The cost/benefit here seems quite unfavorable. SQL is verbose and SQL doesn't make fields inseparable from the relations they are attached to. So while "object.name" makes sense in an object-oriented world it doesn't make as much sense in SQL, object.object_name does. At least at the top level of query, when dealing with physical relations at least, client software has the ability to inspect the result metadata and for those output columns that are from relations it can lookup related information by OID. If anything I would restrict manipulation to this subset of problem space. What I'd want is some way to attach a "human friendly" label to a column and have the server replace the output column name for a physical column with that human readable label instead. I'd still have to alias derived values using "AS" but that's fine. Tying this back to the original request, if we do focus on top-level tlist names in most production cases you'd want "Object Name" instead of " object.name" anyway - so absent something like I describe above you are just back to writing: SELECT object.name AS "Object Name" instead of SELECT * and getting something besides "name" back through some behind the scenes logic. For ad-hoc queries I'd suggest that the incidence of desiring "SELECT *" is considerably higher but that the query author has a considerably greater propensity to know which name is which. So, in short, this feels like something with a small but real audience but a non-trivial design, let alone implementation, and has a large degree of mitigation by adopting technology driven coding and naming standards. For production outputs it doesn't even do that great a job as final output names should strive to be human friendly as opposed to the developer friendly names used in data models. David J.
