"Andrus" <kobrule...@hot.ee> writes:
>> Possibly you could try running contrib/amcheck on the index in question
>> and see if it reports any issues.
> I tried and it reports error
> ERROR: item order invariant violated for index "desktop_baas_liigid_idx"
> DETAIL: Lower index tid=(3,15) (points to index tid=(16,4098)) higher index
> tid=(3,16) (points to index tid=(17,4098)) page
> lsn=292/630C0CE8.
> SQL state: XX002
Uh huh ... and I'll bet the same test on the source server is just fine?
I don't find it surprising in the least that different platforms have
different ideas on fine points like how to sort a leading underscore.
Those things just aren't that well standardized.
regards, tom lane
