"Daniel Westermann (DWE)" <daniel.westerm...@dbi-services.com> writes:
>> People have asked about this before, so maybe it'd be an idea to make
>> an explicit concept of a temp tablespace that only accepts temp tables,
>> and do whatever is needful to make that robust. But I've not heard of
>> any work towards that.
> That's what I thought temp_tablespaces are for ( plus sorts, temporary files
> getting created by materialized views ... )
No ... temp_tablespaces says it's okay to use any of the listed
tablespaces to keep temporary working files in, but it doesn't
say that those tablespaces can *only* be used for that.
The whole business of temp tables (as opposed to those invisible-to-SQL
working files) in such a tablespace is a separate issue, too. I think
that the server would mostly survive having temp-table files disappear
during reboot, but it's not an officially supported or tested scenario.
regards, tom lane
