Adrian Klaver <adrian.kla...@aklaver.com> writes:
> On 3/15/20 2:33 PM, Björn Lundin wrote:
>> I then did ’select * from AMARKETS order by STARTTS’
> Is amarkets in more then one schema?
Yeah, it's hard to think of any explanation other than "the query used a
corrupt index on startts to produce the ordering". But your \d doesn't
show any index on startts. So maybe there's more than one amarkets
table?
Another possibly-useful bit of evidence is to see what EXPLAIN shows as
the query plan for this query.
regards, tom lane
