On Wed, 23 Oct 2019 at 15:50, Mitar <mmi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi! > > Bump my previous question. I find it surprising that it seems this > information is not possible to be reconstructed by the client, when > the server has to have it internally. Is this a new feature request or > am I missing something? > > > I am trying to understand how could I automatically parse an in-line > > composite type. By in-line composite type I mean a type corresponding > > to ROW. For example, in the following query: > > > > SELECT _id, body, (SELECT array_agg(ROW(comments._id, comments.body)) > > FROM comments WHERE comments.post_id=posts._id) AS comments FROM posts > > > > It looks like I can figure out that "comments" is an array of records. > > But then there is no way really to understand how to parse those > > records? So what are types of fields in the record? > > > > I start the parsing process by looking at types returned in > > RowDescription message and then reading descriptions in pg_type table. > > > > Is there some other way to get full typing information of the result I > > am assuming is available to PostreSQL internally? > > > Reading the RowDescription is the only way I am aware of.
Dave Cramer da...@postgresintl.com www.postgresintl.com