Jason Ralph <jra...@affinitysolutions.com> writes:
> I recently upgraded a neglected DB in our fleet that contains a huge table
> (1.4B) rows. I ran a vacuum against the huge table, as expected it took a
> long time, but it did finish.
> I think I understand most of what the output is saying... one confusing
> thing....
> The number of "live " tuples went up..(?)
If you're looking at the pg_stat counter, that's only an approximation.
It's probably a better approximation now than it was before.
regards, tom lane
