Thanks a lot!

On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 12:34 PM Francisco Olarte <fola...@peoplecall.com>
wrote:

> David:
>
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 5:39 PM David Gauthier <davegauthie...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > How can I change the default output of the "age" function to be, for
> example, in minutes?
> > E.g.
> > dvdb=> select age('2019-09-11 09:00:00','2019-09-09 11:00:00');
> >       age
> > ----------------
> >  1 day 22:00:00
> > (1 row)
> > I want the equivalent of that time delta in minutes.
>
> Some answers have already been posted, but also consider what you are
> doing. Intervals have three components, months, days, seconds for a
> reason, ( ignoring leap seconds for now ) not all days have 24h (
> daylight saving time changes ) and not all months have 28/29/30/31
> days. IIRC interval normalization for epoch assumes all months have 30
> days, all days have 24 hours.
>
> If you want to know the elapsed minutes between two timestamps, it
> might be better to do it directly, extract the epoch from both (
> seconds ), substract, divide by 60 truncating/rounding if you need to.
>
> This is what happens in one case on my timezone ( Europe/Madrid ):
>
>
> test=# select '2019.11.20 20:00:00'::timestamptz as end, '2019.06.10
> 10:00:00'::timestamptz as start;
>           end           |         start
> ------------------------+------------------------
>  2019-11-20 20:00:00+01 | 2019-06-10 10:00:00+02
> (1 row)
>
> test=# select age('2019.11.20 20:00:00'::timestamptz, '2019.06.10
> 10:00:00'::timestamptz) as interval;
>         interval
> -------------------------
>  5 mons 10 days 10:00:00
> (1 row)
>
> test=# select extract(epoch from age('2019.11.20
> 20:00:00'::timestamptz, '2019.06.10 10:00:00'::timestamptz)) as
> interval_seconds;
>  interval_seconds
> ------------------
>          13860000
> (1 row)
>
> test=# select extract(epoch from '2019.11.20 20:00:00'::timestamptz) -
> extract(epoch from '2019.06.10 10:00:00'::timestamptz) as
> elapsed_seconds;
>  elapsed_seconds
> -----------------
>         14122800
> (1 row)
>
> Francisco Olarte.
>

Reply via email to