Hi,


I just discovered that a client has done this:



They have two web applications A1 and A2. They have seperate hostnames/URLs. 
Both have a production and a test database A1p and A1t/ A2p and A2t.

What they've done is have both A1p and A2p on the same actual databaser server 
and A1t and A2t on the same server.



So, I'm thinking - if a bug in application A1 crashes the application and 
database badly it will risk bringing down both services A1 and A2. The same 
risk would be evident on a successful security breach.



I would prefer to A1p and A2p on seperate servers, maybe keeping A1t and A2t on 
the same. (This is what seems to be happening when the database servers are 
being repladed).



What is the general thought on the current setup?



/M

    
============================================================================================================================
 Disclaimer: This message and the information contained herein is proprietary 
and confidential and subject to the Tech Mahindra policy statement, you may 
review the policy at http://www.techmahindra.com/Disclaimer.html externally 
http://tim.techmahindra.com/tim/disclaimer.html internally within TechMahindra. 
============================================================================================================================

Reply via email to