>>Home-rolled application, or third party? Are you asking about how they do VMs ? They already provide PG v9.6.7 , so I gather they're not averse to supporting PG DBs.
On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 4:05 PM Ron <ronljohnso...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 5/7/19 1:52 PM, David Gauthier wrote: > > Hi: > > I'm going to be requesting a PG instance supported by an IT team in a > large corp. They will be creating the server as a VM. We will be loading > the DB using scripts (perl/dbi) on linux, possibly using bulk loading > techniques if that's required. Queries will come from both linux and the > web, but typically the number of concurrent users will be on the order of > 10 reads, maybe a couple writers. < 1T total disk, no partitioning. I > will be requesting PITR. > > I need to pick a PG version in my request. I want something that will be > stable and reliable while, of course, being able to perform well. What > would be a good choice for PG version ? > > Also, since the server will be a VM, are there any special > recommendations/suggestions might I forward in the request (install > options, tuning options, other) ? > > > Home-rolled application, or third party? If third party, they'll have > something to say about supported version numbers. > > > -- > Angular momentum makes the world go 'round. >
