Jeremy Schneider <schnj...@amazon.com> writes:
> I'm all for having clear documentation about the security model in
> PostgreSQL, but I personally wouldn't be in favor of adding extra
> wording to the docs just to pacify concerns about a CVE which may have
> been erroneously granted by an assigning authority, who possibly should
> have done better due diligence reviewing the content. Particularly if
> there's any possibility that the decision to assign the number can be
> appealed/changed, though admittedly I know very little about the CVE
> process.
Just FYI, we have filed a dispute with Mitre about the CVE, and also
reached out to trustwave to try to find out why they filed the CVE
despite the earlier private discussion.
regards, tom lane
