Samuel Williams <space.ship.travel...@gmail.com> writes:
> I've been doing some profiling and I was surprised to see that libpq uses
> epoll when handling what essentially amounts to blocking reads/writes.
Yup.
> I was just wondering why it needed to be so complicated?
So that we can also support nonblocking behavior (cf PQisBusy).
If the library were being written from scratch today, I doubt anybody
would bother with that; it'd make more sense for an application to
use a separate thread for the database interaction, if there were
other things it needed to pay attention to concurrently. But it is
what it is.
regards, tom lane
