On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 01:40:28PM +0100, Francisco Olarte wrote: > Thomas: > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 11:22 AM Thomas Güttler > <guettl...@thomas-guettler.de> wrote: > > Thank you for asking several times for a benchmark. > > I wrote it now and it is visible: inserting random bytes into bytea is much > > slower, > > if you use the psycopg2 defaults. > > Here is the chart: > > > > https://github.com/guettli/misc/blob/master/bench-bytea-inserts-postrgres.png > > And here is the script which creates the chart: > > > > https://github.com/guettli/misc/blob/master/bench-bytea-inserts-postrgres.py > > I'm not too sure, but I read ( in the code ) you are measuring a > nearly not compressible urandom data againtst a highly compressible ( > 'x'*i ) data, > are you sure the difference is not due to data being compressed and > generating much less disk usage in toast-tables/wal? > > Francisco Olarte. > +1
Regards, Ken
