Hi,

After better thinking, I have to reply to myself since I m not entirely sure of 
my previous question. (I m digging into the docs, but i do not want to mislead 
you in the meanwhile)

If i recall correctly, written data is parked in WAL buffer before being synced 
to disk (to the transaction log).

I m not sure other clients are able to read from WAL buffer, therefore i m not 
sure the data is available to other clients at that specific point in time.

Maybe somebody else in the ML knows the details by heart?

regards,

fabio pardi



On 15/01/2019 12:15, Fabio Pardi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> all clients will get the latest version of the row (from RAM, that is). The 
> only thing is that in case of server crash, not-yet-written-to-disk commits 
> will be lost.
>
> detailed explanation can be found here:
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/wal-async-commit.html
>
> regards,
>
> fabio pardiĀ 
>
>
> On 15/01/2019 11:58, pshadangi wrote:
>> To improve commit performance we are planning to use 
>> "synchronous_commit=off", with this if multiple clients are reading the same 
>> data/row will they always get the latest updated data/row ? (clients are 
>> using committed read and we are not using clustered environment, we have 
>> just one instance of postgres serving local clients running on the same 
>> machine).
>> For example if client1 updates a row then the updated value is available to 
>> client2 immediately after the commit or there is a delay as commit is now 
>> asynchronous ?
>

Reply via email to