On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 6:08 PM Steve Litt <sl...@troubleshooters.com>
wrote:

> On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 17:39:20 +0200
> Chris Travers <chris.trav...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> > Exactly.  And actually the first sentence is not new.  The second one
> > is a real problem though.  I am going to try one last time at an
> > additional alternative.
> >
> > " To that end, we have established this Code of Conduct for community
> > interaction and participation in the project’s work and the community
> > at large.   This code of conduct covers all interaction between
> > community members on the postgresql.org infrastructure.  Conduct
> > outside the postgresql.org infrastructure may call the Code of
> > Conduct committee to act as long as the interaction (or interaction
> > pattern) is community-related, other parties are unable to act, and
> > the Code of Conduct committee determines that it is in the best
> > interest of the community to apply this Code of Conduct."
>
> Chris,
>
> Would you be satisfied with the CoC if the current 2nd paragraph of the
> Introduction were replaced by the paragraph you wrote above?
>

Yes.  Or something like it.  It need not be exact.

I recognize a need  to be able to take enforcement to some areas off-list
activity, for what it's worth.

>
>
> SteveT
>
> Steve Litt
> September 2018 featured book: Quit Joblessness: Start Your Own Business
> http://www.troubleshooters.com/startbiz
>
>

-- 
Best Wishes,
Chris Travers

Efficito:  Hosted Accounting and ERP.  Robust and Flexible.  No vendor
lock-in.
http://www.efficito.com/learn_more

Reply via email to