On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 3:45 PM, Martín Fernández <fmarti...@gmail.com> wrote:
> From what I could understand (that can be totally wrong), the vacuum > process is split in multiple small transactions. If the autovacuum is > canceled, could it be possible that only the latest transaction work be > lost > >From the docs: "VACUUM cannot be executed inside a transaction block." As it is non-transactional any work it performs is live immediately and irrevocably as it occurs. David J.
