вс, 15 июл. 2018 г. в 23:51, Ravi Krishna <sravikrish...@gmail.com>:
> 1. dbeaver covers many DBMS and even nosql. Many shops are not one > product specific. That is definitely a plus. > On the other hand it is hard to support unique features of PostgreSQL in a tool that attempts to cover all the world. I can't say about DBeaver, but as a rule, cool-abstracted-cross-DBMS-drivers are often limited and don't support many unique features of a concrete DBMS. > 2. Lightweight tool which can run even from command line will be a plus > for the product you are thinking to develop. > Yes. In fact, I have a prototype of such a tool, and use it from command line are useful. For example, if I run it in *compilation* buffer of Emacs, I can easily navigate to the place of error occured at the time of database/schema deployment. > 3. Who cares in what language it is developed? > Many people, in fact. The reasons are different.
