Ken Tanzer <ken.tan...@gmail.com> writes:
> Presumably the complete command would let you figure out it's a rename, and
> the old and new tables. But I found this message (
> https://postgrespro.com/list/thread-id/1561932) stating that a
> pg_ddl_command could only be processed in C, not in a procedural language.
> I'm wondering if that just hasn't been implemented yet and is likely to
> change at some point, or if there is some kind of inherent limitation
> involved.
That's basically the missing infrastructure I referred to. The parse tree
data structures are reasonably well-documented internally (look under
src/include/nodes/), but there's not a lot of mechanism in place for
displaying them to high-level code. We do have decent support for
reverse-compiling DML statements (select/insert/update/delete), but not
for utility commands which is what you're interested in.
There's no inherent reason we couldn't get there, it's just that it'd
be a lot of work to get to reasonable coverage, and probably a lot of
code to maintain going forward.
It looks like src/test/modules/test_ddl_deparse/ contains the beginnings
of a facility of this sort ... but it's only test code and doesn't
necessarily have anybody's blessing as to being a good basis for moving
forward.
regards, tom lane
