On February 11, 2018 12:00:12 PM PST, Nicolas Paris <nipari...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > That is true, but the question is how significant the overhead is. >If >> > it's 50% then reducing it would make perfect sense. If it's 1% then >no >> > one if going to be bothered by it. >> >> I think it's pretty clear that it's going to be way way much more >than >> 1%. > >Good news but not sure to anderstand why.
I think you might have misunderstood my reply? I'm saying that going through PROGRAM will have significant overhead. I can't quite make sense of the rest of your reply otherwise? Andres -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
