On 2018-01-30 08:40:11 +0000, Robert Zenz wrote: > On 30.01.2018 03:07, David G. Johnston wrote: > > So, my first pass at this. > > Nice, thank you. > > > + These are of particular use for client software to use when executing > > + user-supplied SQL statements and want to provide try/catch behavior > > + where failures are ignored. > > Personally, I'd reword this to something like this: > > > These are of particular use for client software which is executing > > user-supplied SQL statements and wants to provide try/catch behavior > > with the ability to continue to use the transaction after a failure. > > Or maybe something like this: > > > These are of particular use for client software which requires > > fine-grained support over failure behavior within a transaction. > > They allow to provide a try/catch behavior with the ability > > to continue to use a transaction after a failure.
I agree. The goal isn't to ignore the error but to handle it.
hp
--
_ | Peter J. Holzer | we build much bigger, better disasters now
|_|_) | | because we have much more sophisticated
| | | h...@hjp.at | management tools.
__/ | http://www.hjp.at/ | -- Ross Anderson <https://www.edge.org/>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
