Em ter, 9 de jan de 2018 às 16:20, Jeff Janes <jeff.ja...@gmail.com> escreveu:
> On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 12:58 PM, Rakesh Kumar <rakeshkumar...@mail.com> > wrote: > >> >> > That said, imv anyway, the performance hit is small and having checksums >> > is well worth it. >> >> I also would like to believe that the hit is small, but when PG official >> document writes "noticeable performance penalty", it becomes difficult to >> convince management that the hit is small :-) >> >> > Why ask us questions if you won't believe our answers? > > Noticeable means it probably isn't important for most real-world cases, > but if you work at it you can probably detect it. > > Cheers, > > Jeff >
