> On 7 Jul 2026, at 02:52, Fujii Masao <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yes. Very old commit dcb00495236 seems to have accidentally changed > the condition to > 2 while rewriting the example to use SQL operator > notation. > > The attached patch changes it from > 2 to >= 2. > Barring any objections, I'll backpatch it to all supported branches. LGTM. I reviewed the referenced commit to see if there were other similar mistakes but found none. -- Daniel Gustafsson
