You do not provide the output of the table description, but write that the system generated the name $2
> 7 квіт. 2025 р. о 16:34 David G. Johnston <david.g.johns...@gmail.com> пише: > > On Sunday, April 6, 2025, PG Doc comments form <nore...@postgresql.org> > wrote: >> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: >> >> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/17/ddl-alter.html >> Description: >> >> url: >> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/ddl-alter.html#DDL-ALTER-REMOVING-A-CONSTRAINT >> >> (If you are dealing with a generated constraint name like $2, don't forget >> that you'll need to double-quote it to make it a valid identifier.) >> >> If I have a constraint with the name $2, are there other constraints with >> names $1, $3 ... ? > > I feel like that whole parenthetical should just go away. The point of the > comment is to remind the user of how identifier values work with respect to > mandatory double quoting. The name itself, other than having a $, has no > special importance. > > David J. >
