On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 9:02 AM Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) <houzj.f...@fujitsu.com> wrote: > > Thanks for the patch. > > Here is one comment: > > The second query has a condition 'WHERE slot_name IS NOT NULL', but I > think it belongs to the first query. Because the slot_name of second query > is built by CONCAT() which means it should be valid, while the first query's > subslotname could be NULL if user executed ALTER SUB SET (slot_name = NONE). >
Thanks for pointing it out. Please find a new patch with this change. Also corrected the commit message in this patch. thanks Shveta
v4-0001-Correction-in-doc-of-failover-ready-steps.patch
Description: Binary data