On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 9:02 AM Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)
<houzj.f...@fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the patch.
>
> Here is one comment:
>
> The second query has a condition 'WHERE slot_name IS NOT NULL', but I
> think it belongs to the first query. Because the slot_name of second query
> is built by CONCAT() which means it should be valid, while the first query's
> subslotname could be NULL if user executed ALTER SUB SET (slot_name = NONE).
>

Thanks for pointing it out. Please find a new patch with this change.

Also corrected the commit message in this patch.

thanks
Shveta

Attachment: v4-0001-Correction-in-doc-of-failover-ready-steps.patch
Description: Binary data

Reply via email to