On Wed, Mar  6, 2024 at 12:42:09AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> I'm kind of inclined to not document this weirdness.  I especially
> don't think it's worth giving an example that neither explains the
> "disregarded" bit nor highlights the dependency on L being given.

I retract my doc patch for this.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <br...@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EDB                                      https://enterprisedb.com

  Only you can decide what is important to you.


Reply via email to