On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 9:08 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Daniel Gustafsson <dan...@yesql.se> writes: > > On 13 Feb 2024, at 20:42, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > >> I'm a little dubious about the "Technical References" list right below > >> it, too. The RFC references are probably useful and stable, and maybe > >> the wikipedia ref is OK, but I have little faith in either the > >> stability or the long-term relevance of the other two links. > > > Not even those are all that stable, while the RFCs' in question haven't been > > replaced they have all been updated with new RFC's which we don't link to. > > I > > think we are better off removing them as well and leaving reading up on > > security/crypto subject an exercise for the reader. > > Good point. Nuking both lists works for me.
+1. -- Magnus Hagander Me: https://www.hagander.net/ Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/
