On Wed, 2023-05-24 at 21:10 +0200, Erik Wienhold wrote: > > On 24/05/2023 15:46 CEST Erik Wienhold <e...@ewie.name> wrote: > > > > Personally, I think it should read cartesian product because cross product > > is > > an overloaded term and cartesian product is used more often in the > > documentation > > overall. > > > > But the same page [0] also uses cross product when talking about grouping > > sets. > > > > [0] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/15/queries-table-expressions.html > > Here's a patch that fixes those two places.
+1 "Cross product" seems to be a misbegotten hybrid of "cross join" and "Cartesian product". Since we are talking about Cartesian products: is the term "Cartesian join" used anywhere? Yours, Laurenz Albe
